“And the meat of a bird”
طَيْرٍ is presented in an undefined form: “a bird”, without specifying any particular kind. The wording leaves the type open rather than narrowing it to one species.
This ayah presents a concise but vivid image: “And the meat of bird from what they desire.” The wording highlights the contrast with the previous mention of fruit and the distinction between choosing and craving.
A careful reading of the ayah’s wording.
طَيْرٍ is presented in an undefined form: “a bird”, without specifying any particular kind. The wording leaves the type open rather than narrowing it to one species.
The only qualification given is “from what they desire or crave”. The emphasis is not on naming the bird, but on the fulfillment of what is inwardly desired.
This ayah’s wording contrasts with the fruit mentioned before it.
With the fruit, it was described as from what they select; with the meat of bird, it is from what they desire and crave.
A tafsir insight on the ayah’s imagery and wording.
Ar-Razi says that when meat and fruit are presented before a hungry person, he inclines toward the meat. In this framing, the hungry person is desirous.
When the same foods are presented before one whose appetite has been satisfied, he inclines toward the fruit. He is not described as desirous in the same way, but rather as choosing.
There is an indication that fruit is in constant presence. This supports the language of selection: one chooses from what is already available.
A bird flies, and when the believer’s soul inclines toward its flesh, it descends roasted or fried according to what he desires.
A visual educational summary of the ayah’s main ideas.
طَيْرٍ
Indefinite wording: not a specified species, but “a bird” in open form.
مِّمَّا يَشْتَهُونَ
The focus shifts from naming to desire: what is wanted and craved.
يَتَخَيَّرُونَ
This earlier idea of selection is contrasted with the stronger wording of desire in this ayah.
يَشْتَهُونَ
Desire indicates active inclination, especially in the Ar-Razi comparison between fruit and meat.
A concise educational synthesis.
The verse does not define the type of bird. This makes the experience broad and open, while the real emphasis falls on fulfillment of desire.
The wording carefully distinguishes between what is selected and what is craved.
Fruit is associated with ongoing presence and selection, while bird meat is associated with longing, appetite, and inclination.
The tafsir image presents meat as arriving in accordance with what is desired, even described as descending roasted or fried according to that desire.